Sometimes, the under-the-hood changes are necessary. Because these releases are the stepping stones for something bigger in the future. A perfect distribution for developers, users and other use cases. Change log. We bring the latest tech, software news and stuff that matters. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Fedora 35 — New Features and Release Details. In this quick post, we round up the new features and updates of Fedora Fedora 35 Workstation pre-release.
This is What's New. Fedora The movies are:. If anyone has any of these films for sale, or knows of anyone who might have prints, please contact me at. Hi every body i have huge collection of 35 mm and 16 mm movie mostly under and some of them are silent movies some of them are only available version in the world.
Thanks Ali. Own a piece of history! Only six prints left in the world. Prints were made by Deluxe in Hollywood. Print is in excellent condition. Included with the print are 10 pairs of original anaglyph glasses and two original posters. All can be autographed by the director. Ships from Los Angeles. Hello all. If your looking can send a list and the prices of these and more. Please write to me at. Hi just started collecting and i am looking for any indiana jones or star wars 35mm films. An historic collection of 35mm prints of 3-D films has been found and is up for sale.
Features, shorts, drama, animation, comedy. Over 20 different titles, multiple prints of some titles, and specialized projection equipment. Would like to sell complete collection as a whole unit. Great condition in the original 20th century fox reel. I also have all four main trailers that were released. Trilogy, and all 3 movies respectively. Scope 2.
Looking for highest offer. Having a hard time letting go, so it may take a hair over market value to give it up. Great condition, properly stored. I am curating a Volume 2 George Pal Puppetoons which we will be restoring. Seeking 35mm nitrate IB Tech prints of several missing Puppetoons in excellent condition without splices, low in scratches.
Only the original prints seen in theaters in contain the cut in color Puppetoon. We are seeking a collector that may have one of those original prints in excellent condition. Special Edition or original releases, complete films or individual reels. I am willing to sell it to help someone else out if it would help. Again, this print is in pristine condition and a great comedy just in case you need to bring levity to your community.
If interested, reach out at. I forgot to comment that I do have many technical items for an older theater with a 35mm projected. If interested…email me at. Hello all, director here selling a very good condition show print ran maybe 3 or 4 times, make me an offer on these well reviewed 6 reels in Goldbergs. Thanks: will include a signed DVD if you like. The cut neg and only other print was asked to be included in the ampas permanent collection and resides in their cold storage vault permanently.
My directorial debut, an honor to be in the vault with Oscar winners and other films they deem important. One reel 12 min and selling the cut neg and print. Beautiful on screen.
Hey Folks — still looking to purchase 35mm Feature Films — single prints or collections. Please email me at Thanks! Login or Sign up.
Blog For Sale 35MM film wanted. Search the blog. Have a news tip for us? Get the latest movie theater news! Subscribe to this blog. Comments With the outstanding game play of the Sandbox hit, Grand Theft Auto: Vice City , in combination with one of the best movies of all time, Back to the Future , this mod is sure to bring countless hours of fun to anybody who enjoyed the movies.
Posted September 25, Time circuits. Plutonium and trash refuel. Hill valley courthouse square. Posted August 24, We've been dragged kicking and screaming into , and to get with the modern times we have updated our social media presence.
If they had perhaps developed means for photo processing machines at one hour labs in useing films for making high resolution positive or negative copies of digital images on film strips, as a means of additional backup of treasured images, I think films would have sustained a better market. While the technology is available today to have digitally images copied into Ektachrome slides, to my knowledge it's fairly expensive and not broadly available.
I'm not sure if one can have their digital images copied onto print films in the form of negatives, but I imagine it is done. Inkjet prints alone, while today more archival and lightfast, likely could not be used for making a high resolution copy of the images printed on them, should somehow the original digtal file of the image had become lost or unreadable.
If Kodak were to offer such services through their Easy Share Gallery alone that was more affordable and easily available, I for one would have nearly a decades worth of digital images that I would want to duplicate into negatives or slides. I imagine many magazines and government agencies would also seek to have a decades worth of digital images stored on disk duplicated on film for archival backup.
With what so many spend in money and effort in capturing their images, I imagine most digital photographers would want to have some of their best and most prized digital images duplicated on film rather than to soley rely on a disk or flash card for which their stored images are not tangible to be viewed with the eye alone.
Some might be surprised to know that the Library of Congress today still uses analog reel-to-reel tape for making archival copies of audio works which are being entered and cataloged into the library.
By their standards, digital means of recording and by which means it can be played, is ever changing and not a reliable means over the long term. Not without routinely transferring the data onto the newer and adapted means within a decades time. The last Super-8 movie camera rolled off it's assembly line 25 years ago. Analog had more than years to develop, and billions of cameras have been manufactured and sold.
They all need to be fed with - you've guessed it - film. Just today I've read the tech specs of Kodak Professional Elite Chrome and stumbled across the information, that this film is also available for 4x5" and 8x10" format. Before 35mm will die, they'll discontinue 8x On the other hand I notice that more and more serious photographers step up to larger formats, particularly 8x10 in the Americas. I am a photographer.
I don't own a digital camera. I still use film for many reasons. I don't worry about the future of film. Not now, not for the years to come. I've read in the LF forum that Kodak just made a statement that 8x10 slide film will be available for at least another 3 years. Then there is the green giant - Fuji. They manufactured the and the W. While the first one is sold out, the second one will hit the market soon.
Does anybody really think they are so stupid to develop a film camera if they plan do quit the film business? Does anybody think Kodak or Fuji would ignore this market? You can bet your butt that someone would purchase the machines from Kodak if they would quit the biz now.
BTW, making film is independent from the format: the machines produce very large sheets or strips, which then will be cut into the final format. That means they would either totally stop the machine or let it run - and supply any format as they've used to do over the last 2 decades. Robin Smith , Feb 24, The format is avalaible online through Silverprint. This is my beloved film. The archival properties of film are one reason why it is still so valuable.
Will we be able to see the digital 'files' we made years from now, like we can routinely see in film-based exhibits often work from years ago or more in museums around the world? So far, the only progress made in the digital sphere on any practical basis is the DNG format, but even this will face extinction as more possibilities are developed. While film is "outdated" compared to digital in most user convenience measures, it remains to be seen how well digital files will survive even the next twenty years.
Which brings us back to the only real archival method for digital files, which is, quite ironically, the creation of actual prints. And while anyone can use the exact same camera used by a photographer years ago and produce similar results using the exact same methods, will anyone be able to use a 5DMkii or D in even 20 years -- it's doubtful these will even exist except on collector's shelves and in pop culture museums.
After bottoming out it seems to me that film is enjoying a small renaissance in the UK, I have a few anedotal sources to support this: I was chatting to the owner of Silverpint a great shop for all things related to film photography who said that film sales have increased recently from their all time low. The Camera Club in Kennington the oldest photographic club in the world where I am a member, has seen an increase in teh use of it's dark rooms.
Lomography although a fad seems to be doing well, judging by the number of shops in London, and is introducing a new generation to film. Flickr groups, such as 'I shoot film' are very well populated and used. I think it will always survive, not in the mainstream, but as a specialised, but important part of photography. The Ongoing "Mystery" is why these threads keep popping up.
But the ignorant can't be bothered with silly things like "Facts". In a couple of days some bonehead will start another thread like this about the death of film and analog photography. And like lemmings, we'll all jump in.
In response to the missive above, I note that the majority of those who predict the continued viability of film proclaim that it is still being made in larger formats, so why worry?
That doesn't relieve those of us who use 35mm E6 exclusively. I've no interest in carrying a Hasselblad around, since most of my photography these days is done during travel abroad, and I'd prefer to keep my neck unbroken. There are, I believe, digital alternatives in medium format. So, you see, my initial inquiry that launched this thread-become-rope was not "boneheaded.
Nobody does K64 now. You would have gotten more pertinent answers and made it easier for future querents to find info. That market began declining rapidly in the late 80's.
I share your concern since I shoot a lot of Super 8 Reversal stock and love to project it directly. So far Kodak seems to be hanging in there with a few E6 emulsions. Fuji has theirs as well. I believe, Mr. Sarile, that I have on at least two occasions thanked the respondents, thinking this thread had played itself out. But in the interest of good manners, I again thank all who responded for the wealth of useful information. Rosener, I believe if you consult my initial posting I specifically mentioned E-6 film.
I said nothing of print or larger formats. I realize that the old "slide show" on the trusty Ektagraphic started going out of vogue some years ago. I, however, still project my slides. A bit quaint, perhaps, but that does not bother me in the least. I thank ALL again for the responses.
The number quite exceeded my expectations. In further response to Mr. Rosener, I specifically noted in the original posting that I was concerned about continued availablity of "E-6 emulsions" for use in my Nikon F I assumed that most persons who would bother to respond would know that the F is a rather celebrated 35mm SLR that has been around for some years.
In short, I think your criticism on this score is groundless. Yours, Shane Usary, soon to become "Cybershane. I dunno if this answers the question but, every time I go into my local Ralph's market, I see Fuji film 4-roll packs on Clearance sale.
In fact, I just bought a few rolls last night. Every time I go in, there is a few more boxes of film, all marked "Clearance Sale! I keep wondering what this means. I'm sure there's been plenty of comments on this. Processing is a bit harder to find. Fuji has a lot more, but the company's overall stance appears to me to be a lot more difficult to discern.
They are also shedding products. I don't know what this means. To be fair, their E6 lineup was pretty large. I was so worried Jeff, that I just purchased a second Nikon F5 a few weeks back. Dave Luttmann , Feb 24, Just shoot film enjoy and adjust as you have too. Just because you shoot film does not mean you can't evolve. I received a telepathic transmission from the Pythia of Delphi earlier in the evening.
I consider her more credible than that dreary early Renaissance fraud Michel de Notre Dame, aka Nostradamus. Nothing in the world so sleep-inducing as the subtle click, click, of the projector and a voice intoning "If this weren't overexposed, you would see Uncle Fred in the water JDMvW , Feb 24, Oh, one last thing or two.
First, I have been a fierce partisan of film for years, as my old and sometimes bellicose battles with "cyberheads" on this very site will attest.
So I have NOT been a "cyberhead" from the beginning. Second, if I had my way, cybernetics and photography would never have become even casual acquaintances. The advent of digital "photography" was the result of a crisis in the camera industry during the 90's, when 35mm camera sales went sharply downward because consumers, satisfied with the excellent and durable 35mm instruments they had, stopped sucuumbing to the temptation to "move up to the latest thing.
So, said the great viziers of Nikon, Canon, and ultimately Sony, we shall simply stop making 35mm cameras and replace them with junky, overpriced digital product. After all, we have a generation of kids coming along who will snap up anything that even remotely connotes cybernetics.
The older folks will eventually join the bandwagon, and happiness will once again reign in The Land of the Rising Sun. Usary that is the most important thing I have heard all day. Who or what the hell is "Harry Turtledove"? Moreover, the relevance of "histological" here is rather obscure to me. Look him up on the internet. Famous Author. Sounds like a nom de plume for a scrivener of childrens' tomes. I still would like an explanation of the relevance of histology here. Sorry you did not get the joke.
If there's a joke there, it's about as obscure as some of W. Burroughs' prose scribbled when he was under the influence of hallucinogens. Or perhaps I'm just becoming too literal-minded.
But then, I fail to see how body tissues and electron microscopes even begin to "fit" here. If joke it was, it must stem from your own, purely private sense of humor. Perhaps you're an aspiring coroner--they get to study body tissues and use cameras, too. Um that rant had nothing to do with what I was talking about.
Sorry I was in on this thread from the beginning and I seem to remember much of it. First post by Shane Usary on Feb 22, ; p. Last post by Larry Dressler on Feb 24, ; p. And slide film and E6 labs still exist! Today, , I use more film than ever before with better emulsions than ever before. Today, , I just picked up my current issue from the door step. I said: no way, we won't see any paperless offices until we will see paperless toilets.
Today, , most of the paper is printed in offices around the world - not in newspapers or magazines! Film is and always will be an economic factor. It is an established, reliable medium. I don't know why so many people want to scare others with these weird predictions. I'm not scared, I just continue to work as usual, enjoying the fantastic new emulsions we could only dream of several years ago. And I know I am not alone! I'll pack my stuff for another shooting today. Arca Swiss.
Several Rodenstock lenses. Plus one of my Contax G2 systems for some quick shots. And I already know it will be a wonderful day. I don't see anything mentioned about E6. I like E6, as stated mostly for Super 8 movie film which I direct project. I gather you never read beyond the title of the posting, old boy.
The specific references to E-6 and my 35mm Nikon F in the body of the posting established the parameters of the question. You don't acquire much information from just scanning the headlines. A final riposte to Mr. I maintain that it's quite a stretch to draw some humorous parallel between the mundane subject of this thread and either the microscopic study of tissues or the occasional jocular references to fraudulent prognosticators. I couldn't resist looking at your profile here. I assume you are the subject of the displayed portrait.
Come on, now. Admit it. You're really Leon Redbone travelling under a pseudonym here, aren't you? Inquiring minds want to know.
If so, I'm a longtime enthusiast for your work. I also never believed you were really Frank Zappa. Oh, one more question for Dressler. If I'm wrong about the Redbone theory, then are you any relation to Marie, the celebrated thespian? Larry, I couldn't help noticing in your photo that there seems to be quite a pile of film laying on your bed. Forgive me Just plain distasteful. Give it up. I see no "inherent absurdity" in the query.
I hoped I might receive a response from someone who follows the photographic press which I seldom do and had run across some authoritative pronouncement. That has not occurred; as usual, people just guess based on their own preferences or fervent hopes. Thanks and farewell to all. Right you are JDM, and it reads more with overstepping in humor to me now than when I had first wrote it. I would love to blame it on the ice that was in my glass last night, but I usually know better regardless.
It was all meant to be in good humor with Larry, and thank you for calling me on it with good candor. I may also be just a tad jealouse, as I've only been with a few films in my lifetime while so many others have tried them all. And with such ease! Usary, you sound young and I would advise that you not taking things too seriously. You obviously have a lot of smarts about you, but I would suggest you relax and roll with the punches.
Don't give up with comming on here and you will find that some questions will draw a lot better response. I would know as I've asked a many which deserved being doused with vinegar. So why does anyone say something they know [little] about? KenPapai , Feb 25, True, some movies have used the Canon EOS but it would not be the camera of choice for a serious cinematographer.
With the movie industry and hospitals moving rapidly to digital I would guess less than 10 years film will be gone. In response to Mr. Watkins, I am not so young, and I received my first 35mm, a little all-manual Ricoh, at age Within a year a relative taught me the craft of the darkroom. I admit to being a bit flippant in some of my responses, but it's all intended to be in good humor, I assure you. I had a little fun with Mr.
0コメント